Tenant Satisfaction Measures

Tenant Satisfaction Measures

In 2024, the Regulator of Social Housing introduced a system for assessing how well all social housing landlords in England are doing at providing good quality homes and services which landlords like us, must report on. These are called Tenant Satisfaction Measures (TSMs).

The measures should let you as tenants see how well we are performing. They allow you to hold us to account when we're not performing as we should and give the Regulator an idea if we might need to improve things for our tenants.

There are 22 measures in total, including:

  • 10 management information measures - these are measured directly by us through information we hold on our systems internally.
  • 12 tenant perception measures - these are measured through feedback surveys also known as tenant perception surveys.
     

The TSMs cover five themes:

  • Keeping properties in good repair
  • Maintaining building safety
  • Respectful and helpful engagement
  • Effective handling of complaints
  • Responsible neighbourhood management
Overall satisfaction

Overall satisfaction with the service provided by us


81.7%

2024/2025

 
76.7%
2023/2024

Notes: We want you to be able to compare how we perform against other housing associations. "Housemark" is an organisation which collects data from lots of housing associations across the country. In the final two columns of the tables below, you'll find the "median" performance figures collected by Housemark, these let you know whether we're performing above or below that benchmark.

The arrows in the "Magenta Year on Year" column show whether our performance has increased, decreased or stayed the same compared to the previous year. Increased arrow (increased) Decreased arrow (decreased) Stayed the same arrow (stayed the same)

Tenant Satisfaction Measures

Magenta 2023/2024

Magenta 2024/2025

Magenta Year on Year Change

Housemark Early Findings Median 2024/2025

Benchmark Median Comparison

Proportion of homes that do not meet the Decent Homes Standard. 0% 0% Same arrow 0.3% Above
Proportion of non-emergency responsive repairs completed within the landlord's target timescale. 92.0% 87.3%
Worse arrow
88.3% Below
Proportion of emergency responsive repairs completed within the landlord's target timescale. 95.8% 95.2% Worse arrow

96.0% Below
Proportion of respondents who have received a repair in the last 12 months who report that they are satisfied with the overall repairs service. 80.9% 79.6% Worse arrow 73.9% Above
Proportion of respondents who have received a repair in the last 12 months who report that they are satisfied with the time taken to complete their most recent repair. 76.8% 78.1% Improved arrow 66.9% Above
Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their home is well maintained. 70.9% 75.6% Improved arrow 72.8% Above

Keeping properties in good repair

 

Non-Emergency repairs target timescales

Priority 2 5 working days
Priority GA

5 working days (gas non-emergency with appointment agreed outside of target time)

Priority G2

5 working days (partial loss of heating)

Priority 3

21 working days

Priority D26

26 calendar days (damp and mould)

The target timescales used to generate TSM RP02 (Repairs completed within target timescale) non-emergency repairs

Emergency repairs target timescales

Priority 1 24 hours
Priority GE 24 hours (gas emergency - risk to life)
Priority GV 24 hours (gas - vulnerable tenant)
Priority G1 24 hours (gas - no heat / no hot water)
The target timescales used to generate TSM RP02 (Repairs completed within target timescale) emergency repairs

Tenant Satisfaction Measures

Magenta 2023/2024

Magenta 2024/2025

Magenta Year on Year Change

Housemark Early Findings Median 2024/2025

Benchmark Median Comparison

Proportion of homes for which all required gas safety checks have been carried out. 100% 100% Improved arrow Not Provided N/A
Proportion of homes for which all required fire risk assessments have been carried out. 100% 100% Same arrow 100% Same
Proportion of homes for which all required asbestos management surveys or re-inspections have been carried out. 100% 100% Same arrow 100% Same
Proportion of homes for which all required legionella risk assessments have been carried out. 94.4% 100% Improved arrow 100% Same
Proportion of homes for which all required communal passenger lift safety checks have been carried out. 94.6% 98% Improved arrow 100% Below
Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their home is safe. 73.7% 79.3% Improved arrow 79.1% Above

Maintaining building safety

Tenant Satisfaction Measures

Magenta 2023/2024

Magenta 2024/2025

Magenta Year on Year Change

Housemark Early Findings Median 2024/2025

Benchmark Median Comparison

Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord listens to tenant views and acts upon them. 53.5% 66.1% Improved arrow 61.9% Above
Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord keeps them informed about things that matter to them. 60.8% 72.5% Improved arrow 73.0% Below
Proportion of respondents who report that they agree their landlord treats them fairly and with respect. 78.5% 80.2% Improved arrow 78.1% Above

Respectful and helpful engagement

Tenant Satisfaction Measures

Magenta 2023/2024

Magenta 2024/2025

Magenta Year on Year Change

Housemark Early Findings Median 2024/2025

Benchmark Median Comparison

Proportion of respondents who report making a complaint in the last 12 months who are satisfied with their landlord's approach to complaints handling. 38.3% 43.2% Improved arrow 35.3% Above
Number of stage 1 complaints received per 1,000 homes. 72.1 75.7 Worse arrow 49.3% Above
Number of stage 2 complaints received per 1,000 homes. 5.8 11.1 Worse arrow 8.2% Above
Proportion of stage 1 complaints responded to within the Housing Ombudsman's Complaint Handling Code timescales. 95% 87.7% Worse arrow 93.4% Below
Proportion of stage 2 complaints responded to within the Housing Ombudsman's Complaint Handling Code timescales. 82.2% 87.1% Improved arrow 91.5% Below

Effective handling of complaints

Tenant Satisfaction Measures

Magenta 2023/2024

Magenta 2024/2025

Magenta Year on Year Change

Housemark Early Findings Median 2024/2025

Benchmark Median Comparison

Proportion of respondents with communal areas who report that they are satisfied that their landlord keeps communal areas clean and well maintained. 72% 75.6% Improved arrow 67.3% Above
Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied that their landlord makes a positive contribution to the neighbourhood. 55.3% 67.5% Improved arrow 66.3% Above
Proportion of respondents who report that they are satisfied with their landlord's approach to handling anti-social behaviour. 53.9% 65.7% Improved arrow 60.1% Above
Number of anti-social behaviour cases, opened per 1,000 homes. 27.8 21.7 Improved arrow 39.4% Below
Number of anti-social behaviour cases that involve hate incidents opened per 1,000 homes 0.6 0.9 Worse arrow Not Provided N/A

Responsible neighbourhood management

Regulator of Social Housing – TSM Guide

If you would like more information about the TSMs, the Regulator of Social Housing has published an ‘easy read’ booklet, which provides more details on the questions asked and why they have been introduced.

You can view the booklet here.

You can also find more information about the TSMs here.
 

Our Approach – TSM Tenant Perception Surveys

Using an independent market research company, a total of 997 surveys were completed in September and October 2023. The surveys were carried out by email (80%) and telephone (20%) to encourage responses from a broad range of our customers and were representative of our tenant population. A £5 voucher was offered as an incentive for the completion of each survey. 

MARU/Matchbox carried out the survey on our behalf which aligned to the Market Research Society Code of Conduct and met the requirements included in the Regulator of Social Housing’s Tenant Satisfaction Measures Standard.

The survey focuses on the tenure type of ‘Low-Cost Rental Accommodation’ in which Magenta Living have over 12,000 of these properties. We have fewer than 100 ‘Low-Cost Home Ownership’ properties and therefore completed the perception surveys for the ‘Low-Cost Rental Accommodation’.

Magenta Living provided details of all our customers with a sample of customers then surveyed. Results are calculated to the required 95% +/- 3% confidence level. 

  • Population size: 12,271                                   
  • Confidence Level: 95%                   
  • Margin of error: +/- 3% 
  • Ideal sample size: 982                     
  • Surveys completed: 997  

The Regulator of Social Housing has set specific questions that are asked as part of the survey with the questions in order and the style that is required. Magenta Living took the opportunity to ask additional questions to help us to develop a greater understanding of our customer base.  A copy of the TSM survey questions can be found here.